Improved wording and layout of health_summary.tpl #52
1 changed files with 8 additions and 9 deletions
|
|
@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
|
|||
<h1>Search your site</h1>
|
||||
<h1>Search for a Friendica node</h1>
|
||||
<form method="GET">
|
||||
<label>Your site URL:</label>
|
||||
<input type="text" name="s" placeholder="example.com" />
|
||||
<label>URL of node:</label>
|
||||
<input type="text" name="s" placeholder="friendica.example.social" />
|
||||
<input type="submit" value="Search" />
|
||||
|
OK! How about like this? Edit: just checked, this subdomain doesn't work. I'll revert it to OK! How about like this? `friendica.example.com` to make it look more like a node URL?
Edit: just checked, this subdomain doesn't work. I'll revert it to `example.com`
Looks good. Looks good.
|
||||
</form>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1>Healthy public sites</h1>
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
<h1>List of optimal Friendica nodes</h1>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
These are sites with their registration set to an open policy and a decent health score.<br>
|
||||
Not on the list: try searching.<br>
|
||||
More info: ask <a href="https://fc.oscp.info/profile/beanow">Beanow</a>.
|
||||
These are nodes with an open registration policy and a good overall health score.<br>
|
||||
Use the above search to display a particuar node's performance information.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<div class="public-sites">$public_sites</div>
|
||||
<div class="public-sites">$public_sites</div>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
example.com is a special domain used for examples, I'm almost certain that this does not hold true for any other example.TLD domain. So either use a real Friendica node, or stick with example.com I'd say.