DAV addon marked unsupported

tobiasd commented

2017-11-03 07:12:36 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

In the current state @hoergen mentioned it is not really useable throwing many errors and needs someone to care about it.

annando commented

2017-11-03 08:07:02 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think we should move this addon to https://github.com/friendica/deprecated-addons

tobiasd commented

2017-11-03 08:44:55 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think we should move this addon to
https://github.com/friendica/deprecated-addons

I don't think unsupported addons should be deprecated immediately. Maybe someone want to pick it up...

> I think we should move this addon to > https://github.com/friendica/deprecated-addons I don't think unsupported addons should be deprecated immediately. Maybe someone want to pick it up...

annando commented

2017-11-03 12:26:01 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I don't like the way this addon is working. AFAIK it isn't connected in any way with our calendar. A new CalDAV should do that, I think.

MrPetovan commented

2017-11-03 13:45:00 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think it should be moved to the deprecated addons repository as well, if someone wants to pick it up we can always bring it back, but the ideal would be having only working addons in the current official addons repo.

annando commented

2017-11-03 14:05:48 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

BTW: I think we also should get rid of those "pseudo-addons". For example I had a look at "group_text". This "addon" in reality is only the frontend for some switch that is used in the core. I think we should move all of these addons into the core.

An addon (for my understanding) is something where the whole coding is done in the addon itself.

BTW: I think we also should get rid of those "pseudo-addons". For example I had a look at "group_text". This "addon" in reality is only the frontend for some switch that is used in the core. I think we should move all of these addons into the core. An addon (for my understanding) is something where the whole coding is done in the addon itself.

tobiasd commented

2017-11-03 15:23:22 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

An addon (for my understanding) is something where the whole coding
is done in the addon itself.

Interesting. For me it can be anything that is not entirely in the core. From a small mod to a totally new thing. So there "pseudo" things you call them, are entirely valid for me.

> An addon (for my understanding) is something where the whole coding > is done in the addon itself. Interesting. For me it can be anything that is not entirely in the core. From a small mod to a totally new thing. So there "pseudo" things you call them, are entirely valid for me.

annando commented

2017-11-03 17:15:30 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Only the setting dialog is in the addon, but no functionality.

tobiasd commented

2017-11-03 17:38:57 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Only the setting dialog is in the addon, but no functionality.

Then the question really is rather, why the setting is not in the user/admin settings already ;-) After that such an Addon could be deprecated.

> Only the setting dialog is in the addon, but no functionality. Then the question really is rather, why the setting is not in the user/admin settings already ;-) After that such an Addon could be deprecated.

DAV addon marked unsupported #436